FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Interpretation is not proof. Validation remains independent.
Does Rockline identify mineral deposits?
No. Rockline interprets geological systems and identifies areas that may warrant further investigation. The existence, size, grade and economic significance of a mineral deposit require independent geological and analytical validation.
Does an anomaly mean there is a deposit?
No. An anomaly is an observation. Its significance depends on its geological context. Rockline therefore considers anomaly information together with structural relationships, connectivity, geometry and depth continuity.
Does Rockline replace drilling?
No. Drilling remains an essential validation method where direct geological information is required. Rockline’s role is to help determine where and how subsequent investigation may be focused.
Does Rockline replace the client's geologist?
No. The interpretation is an independent technical input. It is intended to be reviewed together with the client’s geological understanding and other exploration information.
Can the interpretation be used for a Mineral Resource estimate?
The interpretation may provide geological input to subsequent resource-related work. It is not itself a Mineral Resource estimate. Resource estimation, classification and reporting must be performed by the appropriately qualified professionals under the applicable reporting framework.
Is the interpretation a JORC or NI 43-101 resource statement?
No. Rockline does not present its interpretation as a Mineral Resource or Ore Reserve statement. The interpretation can be structured to provide information compatible with subsequent work performed under applicable reporting standards.
Can Rockline recommend drilling locations?
Yes. Where the interpreted system provides a reasonable basis, Rockline can identify proposed validation locations, sections and target geometry. The final drilling programme remains the responsibility of the client and its geological advisers.
What happens if the available data are unsuitable?
The project may be declined or its scope may be limited. It is preferable to recognise an input-data limitation before interpretation than to produce a technically precise-looking result from unsuitable information.
Have a project to discuss?
Send us the project location, area of interest and available exploration data. We will assess whether the available information is suitable for system-level interpretation.